Welcome back to another installment in our series dedicated to the tools and techniques that shape our practice in school-based occupational therapy. Today, we're zeroing in on a cornerstone of our work that is often overshadowed by more talked-about areas like sensory processing or fine motor skills: visual perception and visual motor integration.
As you well know, these skills are not just 'nice-to-haves'; they are essential for our students' academic achievements and day-to-day functioning. Whether it's decoding text in a reading assignment, copying notes from the board, or participating in a physical education class, the ability to accurately perceive visual information and translate it into coordinated motor actions is vital.
In this article, we'll dive into the assessment tools and processes that are our go-to resources for evaluating these skills. These aren't just diagnostic instruments; they're communication tools that help us articulate our students' needs to teachers, parents, and IEP teams. By the end of this guide, you'll have a deeper understanding of each tool's strengths and limitations, empowering you to choose the most appropriate assessments for your students and to advocate more effectively for the services they need.
Understanding Visual Perception and Visual Motor Assessments
As an OT practitioner, you've likely found yourself in an IEP meeting trying to explain the importance of visual perception and visual motor skills to a room full of educators and parents. These skills are often misunderstood or inappropriately lumped into one category. Yet, they are foundational to a student's ability to learn and interact with their environment effectively.
Visual perception involves the brain's ability to interpret and make sense of visual stimuli, such as shapes, colors, and patterns. Visual motor integration, on the other hand, is the coordination of visual perception and motor skills. This is where the rubber meets the road, so to speak, in activities like handwriting, cutting with scissors, or catching a ball. Too often, educators (OTPs included) are too quick to label a problem as “visual-motor” rather than dig deeper to find the root motor or perception difficulty.
As school-based OT practitioners, we're in a unique position to assess these skills and translate our findings into actionable insights for teachers, parents, and other members of the IEP team. The assessments we choose serve multiple purposes: they help us identify specific challenges a student may be facing, guide our intervention planning, and provide a quantitative measure that can be tracked over time to gauge the effectiveness of interventions.
But choosing the right assessment tool isn't always straightforward. Each tool comes with its own set of advantages and limitations, from the age range it's suitable for to the specific skills it measures and the time required for administration. That's why it's crucial to be well-versed in the range of available assessments, understanding not just how to administer them, but also how to interpret the results in the context of a student's overall occupational performance and participation in school activities.
Below, I'll break down some of the most commonly used assessment tools for visual perception and visual motor skills, providing you with the information you need to make informed decisions in your practice. We'll cover everything from the basics of each tool to tips on administration and interpretation, as well as the benefits and limitations as we see them in our day-to-day practice.
Let’s do this!
Visual Perception Assessment Tools
As school-based OT practitioners, we know that visual perception is more than just "seeing" — it's about understanding and interpreting what is seen. The tools explored below can help us identify the unique challenges our students face, whether it's distinguishing shapes in math class or understanding spatial relationships in a physical education setting.
Note that some of these tools also include subtests that measure visual motor skills separately from the subtests that measure visual perception skills. However, I have placed the assessment tool here based on what I feel it measures best - visual perception skills.
TVPS-4 (Test of Visual-Perceptual Skills)
Brief Overview: Evaluates visual-perceptual abilities across seven domains, including visual discrimination, visual memory, and spatial relationships.
Subtests: Visual Discrimination, Visual Memory, Spatial Relationships, Form Constancy, Sequential Memory, Figure-Ground, and Visual Closure.
Age Range: 4-18+ years
Time Needed: 25-45 minutes
Administration Format: Multiple-choice
Benefits: Comprehensive assessment of visual-perceptual skills, useful for targeted interventions.
Limitations: Requires controlled testing environment and does not assess visual motor skills.
MVPT-4 (Motor-Free Visual Perception Test)
Brief Overview: Assesses visual perception without motor involvement.
Subtests: Visual Discrimination, Spatial Relationship, Visual Memory, Figure–Ground, Visual Closure.
Age Range: 4-80+ years
Time Needed: 25-35 minutes
Administration Format: Multiple-choice
Benefits: Motor-free, suitable for a wide age range.
Limitations: It may not capture subtle difficulties and does not assess at visual motor capabilities.
DTVP-3 (Developmental Test of Visual Perception)
Brief Overview: Comprehensive look at both visual perceptual skills and visual-motor integration.
Subtests: Eye-Hand Coordination, Copying, Figure-Ground, Visual Closure, Form Constancy, Visual-Motor Speed
Age Range: 4-10 years
Time Needed: 20-30 minutes
Administration Format: Paper and pencil
Benefits: Comprehensive, includes both motor-reduced and motor-enhanced subtests.
Limitations: Limited age range, but that leads to our next tool, the DTVP-A
DTVP-A:2 (Adolescent & Adult Version)
Brief Overview: Tailored for adolescents and adults.
Subtests: Similar to DTVP but adapted for an older age group.
Age Range: 11-74 years
Time Needed: 20-30 minutes
Administration Format: Paper and pencil
Benefits: Age-appropriate for adolescents and adults. Includes both a VP and a VM component. This tool is a favorite of mine when working with students in high school.
Limitations: Limited to adolescent and adult populations.
Visual Motor Assessment Tools
Visual motor skills are where perception meets action. These skills are essential for tasks that require coordination of visual perception with fine and gross motor skills, such as handwriting, cutting, and ball skills. The following tools are designed to assess these integrated skills.
Note that some of these tools also include subtests that measure visual perceptual skills separately from the subtests that measure visual motor skills. However, I have placed the assessment tool here based on what I feel it measures best - visual motor skills.
PDMS-3 (The Peabody - Eye-Hand Coordination Subtest)
Brief Overview: Focuses on eye-hand coordination.
Subtests: Eye-Hand Coordination
Age Range: 0-5 years
Time Needed: 5-10 minutes
Administration Format: Manipulatives
Benefits: Suitable for very young children, relatively quick to administer once you get used to it.
Limitations: Limited to eye-hand coordination. Limited age range, as well. No activities that directly assess perception.
VMI-6 (Beery-Buktenica Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration)
Brief Overview: Assesses the integration of visual and motor skills.
Subtests: Visual-Motor Integration, Visual Perception Test (Supplemental), Motor Coordination Test (Supplemental)
Age Range: 2-100 years
Time Needed: 10-15 minutes
Administration Format: Paper and pencil
Benefits: Widely recognized, strong psychometric properties.
Limitations: May not capture full complexity. I have also found that many school psychologists use the VMI. So check in with your school psych before deciding to use the Berry VMI.
WRAVMA (Wide Range Assessment of Visual Motor Abilities)
Brief Overview: Assesses visual-motor skills, visual-spatial skills, and fine motor skills.
Subtests: Drawing (VMI), Matching (VP), Pegboard (Motor Coordination)
Age Range: 3-17 years
Time Needed: 15-25 minutes
Administration Format: Requires manipulatives and paper and pencil
Benefits: Wide age range, assesses multiple domains. I sometimes prefer the WRAVMA over the VMI when I am working with younger students. It is a little more relatable with the pictures and activities.
Limitations: Requires multiple manipulatives.
BOT-2 (Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition)
Brief Overview: The BOT-2 is a comprehensive motor assessment with various subtests that can provide insights into a child's visual-motor skills and, to some extent, visual perception.
Subtests Relevant to VP and VM: Fine Motor Precision, Fine Motor Integration, & Manual Dexterity
Age Range: 4-21 years
Time Needed: Varies depending on the number of subtests administered; each subtest can take between 5-15 minutes.
Administration Format: Manipulatives and paper and pencil
Limitations: I know... it doesn’t use the term “visual motor” in the title or as a subtest, but the BOT-2 absolutely looks at VM skills. It just calls them “Fine Motor Integration.” As such, you may need supplementary assessments for a comprehensive understanding of these skills.
Informal Assessment of Visual Perception and Visual Motor Skills
While formal assessments provide standardized data and are essential for diagnosing specific issues, informal assessments offer a more flexible approach that can be tailored to individual student needs and classroom environments. These assessments are particularly useful for capturing a holistic view of a child's abilities and challenges.
Classroom Activities: Observe the student during typical classroom activities like writing, cutting, or drawing. Look for signs of difficulty in tasks that require visual-motor integration or visual perception.
Playground/Gym: Observing a child during physical education or free play can provide insights into their gross motor visual-motor skills, such as hand-eye coordination in ball games.
Teacher and Parent Interviews
Questionnaires and Interviews: Questionnaires and Interviews can be used to gather information from teachers and parents about a child's performance in daily activities that require visual perception and visual-motor skills.
IEP Meetings: Use these meetings as an opportunity to discuss any concerns about a child's visual perception or visual-motor skills and learn more from the other adults working with the student.
Handwriting Samples: Analyze a student's handwriting for signs of visual-motor difficulties, such as inconsistent letter formation or poor spacing.
Functional Tasks: Break down everyday tasks that the student finds challenging, such as tying shoelaces or using scissors, to identify specific visual-motor or visual-perceptual difficulties.
Scaffolding: Provide varying levels of support during a task to see how much assistance the student requires for successful completion. This can help identify the specific skills that need to be targeted in intervention.
Error Analysis: Examine the types of errors a student makes during visual-motor or visual-perceptual tasks to understand the underlying challenges.
By integrating both formal and informal assessments into your practice, you can develop a more comprehensive understanding of a student's visual perception and visual-motor skills, leading to more effective and individualized intervention plans.
You've assessed the student. Now what?
Sign up for the A-Z School-Based OT Course to help you better understand how to complete an OT evaluation. You'll get access to my evaluation document template to improve your evaluation write-ups!
Assessing Beyond Functional Skills
Visual perception and visual-motor skills are just one piece of the puzzle when it comes to a child's academic performance and overall well-being. Often, these skills are intertwined with other areas of development, such as fine motor skills, executive functioning, and even social-emotional skills. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation often requires us to look beyond just visual perception and visual-motor skills to understand the whole child. This might involve assessments in one or more of the following areas:
Fine Motor Skills: Assessing a student's ability to use and coordinate small muscles in the hands and fingers to perform precise movements required for handwriting, opening containers, and more.
Executive Functioning: Assessing skills related to organization, time management, planning, and self-regulation to address challenges that impact task initiation, focus, time management, and assignment completion.
Functional and Independence skills: Assessing students' ability to perform daily living tasks, such as dressing and grooming, to enhance independence and functional participation.
Sensory Processing: Evaluating how students perceive and respond to sensory information to develop strategies for managing sensory challenges and promoting engagement in school activities.
Social-Emotional Skills: Assessing students' social interactions, emotional regulation, self-awareness, and coping strategies to enhance social skills, self-esteem, and emotional well-being, fostering positive relationships and school engagement.
By considering these additional areas and employing comprehensive assessment approaches, we can address the diverse needs of students and support their holistic development, functional participation, and overall well-being in the school environment.
The Wrap Up
Visual perception and visual motor skills are integral to a child's academic and daily life success, and as school-based OT practitioners, we are uniquely positioned to assess and intervene in these areas. From formal assessments like the VMI, TVPS, and DTVP, to informal methods such as classroom observations and task analysis, we have a wide array of tools at our disposal. Each tool comes with its own set of benefits and limitations, and the choice of assessment should be tailored to the individual needs of each student.
Thank you for joining me in this deep dive into visual perception and visual motor assessment tools. I hope you've found this guide useful in enhancing your practice and supporting the children who rely on your expertise.
Until next time, keep doing what you do best—making a difference in the lives of your students.
PS. If you appreciate this article, be sure to join our email list below to know when the next helpful article related to school-based OT becomes available.
Get my Evaluation Report Template and start feeling confident knowing you conducted a solid school-based OT evaluation.
Sign up for the A-Z School-Based OT Course to help you better understand school-based OT and create systems to ensure you are giving each student your absolute best.